Sunday
Saturday
CET/Free trade
Therefore tariffs are OK to protect farmers, yes?
But, hang on, tariffs against EU farmers restrict free trade and therefore are against the greater good...aren't they?
So how can tariffs be good and bad?
Visitors
Sunday
The Bank of England should seek to deliberately increase inflation!
The reasoning behind this would be to ensure that there were negative real interest rates.
If the Bank of England commits itself to producing significant inflation then real interest rates could become negative.
Thus people might borrow money (at 0% interest) and repay in their (devalued) pounds.
This would give people a significant incentive to borrow and spend.
A little more inflation might be preferable to rising unemployment or a series of fiscal measures that pile on debt bequeathed to future generations.
The idea of negative interest rates may strike some people as absurd, the concoction of some impractical theorist. Perhaps it is. But remember this: Early mathematicians thought that the idea of negative numbers was absurd. Today, these numbers are commonplace. Even children can be taught that some problems (such as 2x + 6 = 0) have no solution unless you are ready to invoke negative numbers.Specific tax
From 6.00 pm on 22nd April 2009, tobacco duty will increase by 2 per cent. The rates will be:
Product | Duty | Effect of tax* on typical item (increase in pence) | Typical unit |
---|---|---|---|
Cigarettes | 24 per cent of the retail price plus £114.31 per thousand cigarettes | 7p | packet of 20 |
Cigars | £173.13 per kilogram | 3p | packet of 5 |
Hand-rolling tobacco | £124.45 per kilogram | 7p | 25g |
Other smoking tobacco and chewing tobacco | £76.12 per kilogram | 4p | 25g of pipe tobacco |
* Tax refers to duty, plus VAT
This increases tobacco duty in line with inflation.
Here's a diagram showing tobacco tax.
The problem is that the cigarettes in my local tobacconist went up by the 7p i.e. the full amount of tax. This means the price rose by ALL the tax.
Does this mean that the demand is perfectly inelastic?
I think not.
Try drawing the diagram with the price rising by 7p i.e. the full amount of tax.
Then consider beer.
From Thursday 23 April 2009, alcohol duty rates will increase by 2 per cent above the rate of inflation.
Alcohol duties will increase by 2 per cent above the rate of inflation in each of the next four years.
Product | Effect of tax* on typical item | Typical unit |
---|---|---|
Beer (4.2% abv) | 1p | pint of beer |
Wine | 4p | 75cl bottle |
Sparkling wine | 5p | 75cl bottle |
Spirits (37.5% abv) | 13p | 70cl bottle |
Spirits-based ready to drink | 1p | 275ml bottle |
Cider and perry | 1p | litre |
* Tax refers to duty, plus VAT
Beer in my local went up by 1p - but demand is not perfectly inelastic.
So - what's happened?
Is the tax diagram rubbish?
Price mechanism
Monday
Public goods (You plan to study Economics at University?)
The station should be able to raise approximately the same amount of money if it had 5 listeners or 50,000.
5 listeners will not support a station i.e. they will not give enough.
Therefore sucha radio station cannot exist.
But it does.
Nonsense?
Have a read of this - and enjoy the Maths.
Perfect competition
If they cost anything at all then that would be a barrier to entry!
Therefore as they cost nothing to produce all a firm has to do is produce (with no resources) an infinite number of goods and thus make an infinite profit.
Easy!
...or is it?
Comparative advantage
If a country has absolute advantage in both products which one do you specialise in?
Obviously the one where the gap between the maximum output of Country A and Country B is the greatest! If you draw it with two straight lines it's where there's the greatest distance.
That's what the IB Economics book says - so it must be right...mustn't it...?
Friday
Income elasticity of demand
This will have begative income elasticity of demand.
Thus as income falls, demand rises.
Equally as income rises, demand falls.
OK....
If the price of the inferior good rises then real income falls.
Thus as per above, more is demanded.
So, the price of inferior godos rises and so does demand. So all retailers who sell cheap and tacky goods have to do is...raise the price!
Yeah?
Now let's deal with some of the comments:
The rise in price depends on the reaction of demand?????
- 04 May 2009 00:25
- Mr.Lex said...
-
"If the price of the inferior good rises then real income falls.
Thus as per above, more is demanded."
Not agree,about inferior goods,we're not considering about the price
Income and demand
Income increases so the demand curve shifts to the right.
Now let's talk about elasticity.
One of the factors that affects elasticity is...income.
Therefore if income rises the SLOPE (gradient) of the demand curve changes...to the right.
Yeah?
If the price for inferior good rises the difference between inferior good and normal good will get less and because of that more people will switch to the normal good.
Yes but not everyone. I am referring to the people that do NOT switch!
In addition to that if the price of an inferior good rises it doesn't mean that the real income of all people becomes less. It will become less only for those who buy only that good.
I think the answer could be :
If the real income falls because of people spent more on inferior goods, therefore the inferior goods wont be demanded more because they bought inferior goods already.
But if the good is a consumer non-durable then there may be regular puchases
Rise in price of inferior goods will depend on how much demand response to the change in prise, it does not depend on the YED.